Scrounging papers ...
Oct. 12th, 2007 11:41 amErm ... I don't suppose anyone has an unwanted copy of Tuesday's Guardian (9th October) lying about the place by any chance? Or failing that, the Times? The reason for this odd request is that I now find that both papers had an advert by the Communications Workers Union, asking people to support them, that I missed. As you may (or may not) know, I collect material related to postal strikes -- mainly the big 1971 one, but I have been trying to keep up with the press cuttings for the latest round of disputes and retain delayed letters that I've received ...
Local sourcing of the missing papers has sadly proven fruitless so far. It seems newsagents can't get back copies for love nor money. I had hopes of persuading the library, which used to keep a month's back copies, to let me buy them when they were thrown out -- unfortunately it appears that they keep them for a year now, because The Cutbacks means they can't always afford the microfiche versions. And although a friend gave me a copy of Tuesday's Telegraph, apparently the CWU didn't waste their money by advertising there. :)
So if you happen to have a spare copy around, or indeed a copy of last Saturday's' or Monday's paper ... um, could I have it please, pretty please? I'll happily reimburse the postage and packing costs ... ::plaintive look::
Local sourcing of the missing papers has sadly proven fruitless so far. It seems newsagents can't get back copies for love nor money. I had hopes of persuading the library, which used to keep a month's back copies, to let me buy them when they were thrown out -- unfortunately it appears that they keep them for a year now, because The Cutbacks means they can't always afford the microfiche versions. And although a friend gave me a copy of Tuesday's Telegraph, apparently the CWU didn't waste their money by advertising there. :)
So if you happen to have a spare copy around, or indeed a copy of last Saturday's' or Monday's paper ... um, could I have it please, pretty please? I'll happily reimburse the postage and packing costs ... ::plaintive look::
no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 11:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 12:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 12:38 pm (UTC)email address is catherinemck @ [warm]mail.com
no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 01:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-12 06:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-25 08:25 pm (UTC)It got pretty tough in spots - we were mainly eating potatoes from the allotment towards the end (given my mother's track record at cooking this was not entirely the hardship it sounds), strike pay being more of a concept than an actuality.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-26 03:11 pm (UTC)As for the private posts, from a collector's point of view they're mostly just fun, with a fascinating postal history side order of a bunch of local services trying to coalesce to give some kind of wider coverage -- like watching 18th/19th century international postal developments in microcosm and on fast forward. I'd probably feel a lot more ambivalent about them if they had actually provided a service that was particularly effective at strike-breaking; it's apparent that for the most part they were nothing like a proper alternative -- five times the cost, one-tenth of the speed, and about one-twentieth of the coverage. (The exception being creamed-off city centre and circular deliveries, of course, which is why I didn't much like the EU 'competition order' throwing deliveries open.)
Then again, what collectors collect can sometimes apparently be at variance with their politics -- another example that springs to mind is one lifelong Conservative who put together an amazing collection of the mails of the International Brigades in the Spanish Civil War -- but there you go, these things can still be interesting postal and historical episodes. I'll collect stuff from Edward Martell's 'People's League' and 'Freedom Group' of the 1960s, despite the fact that Martell himself was a somewhat nutty Monday Club-type right-wing extremist. I suppose on balance that it broadens the mind, or something. :)
no subject
Date: 2007-10-13 09:01 am (UTC)(At work we've got the wildcat postal strikes, plus some electric bod at the LEA has cut the wrong wire and all the schools have no Internet or email. When the phone lines go down, I'll know Something is Coming to Get Us.)
no subject
Date: 2007-10-13 09:23 am (UTC)(And if you get any delayed mail coming into the school as a result of the strikes, I wouldn't mind the envelopes. Just sayin'. :D)
The only thing in last Saturday's paper that I found in the library was a short piece of about three paragraphs at the bottom of one LH page saying that the PO had cut a deal with the managerial union in their separate dispute, presumably on standard tactical grounds. (I'd seen it on the website, but unfortunately it was easily short enough to miss when I checked the paper last Saturday -- the website often has stories that aren't part of the paper.) It was a fair way in AFAIR -- possibly the financial section?
no subject
Date: 2007-10-13 09:46 am (UTC)Main section, bottom of p42.
Do you want the whole paper, a four-page foldout, the page or what? We'll post it today if I can find my A5 envelopes.
Mind you, there is a postal strike, so I can't say when you will get it. Given the article subject, they should perhaps offer a Manager's Delivery as a special service?
no subject
Date: 2007-10-13 10:25 am (UTC)Many thanks for this, btw, it's very kind of you. I know it's a rather oddball request, even by fandom standards. :)
no subject
Date: 2007-10-13 10:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-13 05:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-13 09:41 am (UTC)If by any chance you do want it as well, you can email me at gilpin25.metamorficmoon@gmail.com.