snorkackcatcher: (Default)
[personal profile] snorkackcatcher
So, I've been working a bit on my Rita-Merope [livejournal.com profile] omniocular character roulette story, and I came across something in the books that I'm not sure quite makes sense ... Comments and suggestions would be appreciated!



The problem I have is that it says in OotP that 'Rita had pressed him [Harry] for every last detail and he had given her everything he could remember'. That would surely include several important things that don't seem to be common knowledge in the wizarding world as of HBP, but which he would have found it awkward to avoid mentioning if he was to explain things properly:

(1) Peter Pettigrew is alive and assisted Voldemort's rebirth

(2) Sirius Black is therefore innocent

(3) The wand connection effect and the fact that the wands of Harry and Voldemort share cores.

(4) Significant details of Voldemort's background:

a. the story of his parents (although his mother's name wasn't mentioned, his father's was)
b. the fact that he used bone from his father's grave
c. the orphanage
d. therefore the fact that he was a half-blood

So how much of this is likely to have been in the interview, and how much is it reasonable to suppose would have been forgotten or deliberately left out by Harry (or alternatively suppressed by Hermione)?

And the related question -- how much of it is actually accepted fact by 'now' (end of HBP)? Certainly (1) and (2) seem to be, but (3) doesn't seem to be and (4) I'm not sure about.

I'd like to find a good way to argue that the stuff in (4) wasn't mentioned at that time, or (even better) was mentioned but not published, and I really need Rita to remember hearing the name 'Tom Riddle'. :)

As a related issue, does anyone else think that the DE Central that Harry gets visions of in OotP is in the old Riddle House?

(Also asking on this revived thread at FAP.)

Date: 2006-05-15 11:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] catkind.livejournal.com
Re 4) - have wondered how LV played his origins, if there was ever a political aspect to his campaign - or in the raising of minions. Could he conceivably have spun it as a rising from humble origins, look how awful these muggles are, must prevent any wizard from having to go through such a childhood again? It's hard to see it could have remained particularly secret given how many of Riddle's schoolmates are still around. Or is LV=Tom Riddle a secret too?

Is it necessary that people don't know (3)? They might know it but not be particularly interested, or count it as part of the 'chosen one' rumour. Haven't really thought this out...

Date: 2006-05-15 11:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] octobersnow.livejournal.com
*snerk* Lord Voldemort = Karl Rove of the Wizarding World. Actually, that fits. I can see Voldy being an adept spinner.

Date: 2006-05-16 08:05 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] catkind.livejournal.com
Point. One wonders how it all started though. If he didn't use his connections as Riddle, he would have had to arrive back in the UK hooded, or unrecognisable as a result of all that longevity treatment, and pretend to be a stranger (pretend to be foreign? pretend to be 250 years old already?). In a world where everyone went to the same school, how did LV get into the Slytherin in-crowd without knowing anybody?

Don't think I've been sufficiently worried by Ollivander's disappearance either. Is he to be forced to make LV a new wand? Or find out how to use the twinning effect against Harry?

It does kind of sound like DD is trying to cover up LV's origins too. Never mind calling him Voldemort and not You-Know-Who, why not go the whole hog and tell people to call him Tom Riddle? If DD kept saying it, everyone would know, even if they were scared to say it. Um. Better go before I stray into the territory of any feral magic dishwashers...

Date: 2006-05-16 10:34 am (UTC)
tree_and_leaf: Watercolour of barn owl perched on post. (Default)
From: [personal profile] tree_and_leaf
Well, it could be argued that revealing Riddle was a half-blood could be seen as evidence by the pure-blooders (see, I always said interbreeding produces unstability...)

Date: 2006-05-16 04:19 pm (UTC)
tree_and_leaf: Watercolour of barn owl perched on post. (Default)
From: [personal profile] tree_and_leaf
Ooh, I'd forgotten that...

Date: 2006-05-17 01:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nineveh-uk.livejournal.com
although Voldy only ever mentions that his father was buried there, not any of the other details
Did Riddle ever mention that his mother or father was a Muggle (after all, he believed his father was a wizard for some time) at school, though> As soon as he perceived the importance of blood in the WW he could easily have come up with a simple story of his mother running away from her true people etc. etc. without mentioning that the man he ran with was a Muggle, and that he grew up in the Muggle orphanage because the WW didn't know about him. Riddle sounds like a pseudonym, after all.

Date: 2006-05-16 07:52 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lilacsigil.livejournal.com
Overall, I doubt Harry would have left anything out. He's not known as "The Boy Who Could Keep His Mouth Shut", especially in Book 5.
1 & 2) I could easily see Hermione and/or Rita mentioning "a Death Eater" rather than naming Pettigrew if too much deviation was required from the main article, the point of which is that Voldemort is back. Alternatively, they might have published it, but it just wasn't as important as the part about Voldemort to anyone but Harry, so the general public weren't paying much attention. I bet Rufus Scrimgeour was paying attention, though.

3) I think he would have had to mention the wands connection effect. Voldemort doesn't look dangerous if he is defeated in a duel by a teenager, but if the teenager escapes only by a fluke (or destiny if you prefer) Voldemort's power is undiminished. I think it would be public knowledge that the wands connected and weird stuff happened, but people may not know about priori incantem - that's pretty esoteric stuff.

4) Harry could have easily narrated the story without mentioning the orphanage or Tom's muggle/witch parents in particular. The graveyard would surely have been used as a dramatic setting, and I'm sure the name Tom Riddle would have been used, but there's no reason for Harry (who is not very political yet) to go into detail about Voldemort's half-blood background. No reason why Rita wouldn't go and check it out herself, though.

Date: 2006-05-16 10:32 am (UTC)
tree_and_leaf: Watercolour of barn owl perched on post. (Default)
From: [personal profile] tree_and_leaf
What, Rita doing proper research, as opposed to getting half a piece of information and going with that?

Date: 2006-05-17 12:37 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lilacsigil.livejournal.com
Oh, I think Rita likes to know everything she possibly can. Then she'll put her spin on it and turn the story into how she's decided it really was!

Date: 2006-05-16 10:48 am (UTC)
tree_and_leaf: Watercolour of barn owl perched on post. (Default)
From: [personal profile] tree_and_leaf
I think (4) can't have been in the interview, otherwise one of the Death Eaters would have said something along the lines of 'calm down, Bellatrix, that's the same rubish he was spouting in the Quibbler'. This may be because Harry didn't mention it (he's pretty focussed on getting the story out about the fact that Voldemort is back, rather than the mechanics of it. Or he may think that going into Voldemort's origins would be counterproductive - taking his cue from Dumbledore, who is cagey about it).

Alternatively, Rita cut it out, because she thought it was too incredible, she wanted to sit on it until she could verify it (mind you, that implies that she's acting like a responsible journalist), or she wants to save it up for later - or trying to limit the amount she offends the DEs by, in case they win...

On (3): I think Harry would have played down the mechanics of the connection, though I agree it has to be mentioned in some form. But we're told earlier in GoF that he doesn't want people knowing about the connection. I expect Rita spun it into part of him being 'the Chosen One', or perhaps came up with some sentimental link to Lily's sacrifice - I can't see her being interested enough into an osbcure point about the nature of wandmaking to dig deeply enough to work out what that implied. (Sirius is the only person, other than Dumbledore, who seems to know about it, but I could see Sirius, while only putting minimal effort into schoolwork, going deeply into areas of magic that interest him, and accumaulating a lot of out-of-the-way lore).

Date: 2006-05-16 05:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] heartsncraftslb.livejournal.com
Okay...I have a few ideas on the subject.

1/2: I have a definite feeling Harry mentioned Peter Pettigrew; after all, in the first chapter of OotP, Fudge seemed to be pretty quick to admit the Ministry was wrong on a great deal of counts, including Voldemort's return and the fact that Sirius was innocent. It's possible he realized that much of the Quibbler interview was spot-on, including the fact that Pettigrew is indeed alive, AND was the one who joined forces with Voldemort.

3: I'd guess that Harry said something along the lines of, "the wands connected" to Rita, but don't know how much he'd elaborate. Certainly he either shrugged off further questions, or claimed ignorance as to why that would happen, if Rita asked. I have the feeling he just plowed on, at that point, to get through the story of his escape from the graveyard.

4: As for the graveyard itself, Harry may have just said he and Cedric were transported to a graveyard, and after Cedric was killed, Harry was tied to a tombstone, and LV "used bone from the grave". I have a feeling Harry wouldn't've wanted to go into too much details about the specific incantations used.

(Sorry if this is useless blithering or makes no sense...it seems I'm about to be late to pick my kiddo up at Kindy, but this got me thinking -- thanks for setting my brain in motion! Now I want to write the actual Quibbler interview. Down, plotbunny, down!) - LB

Profile

snorkackcatcher: (Default)
snorkackcatcher

January 2020

S M T W T F S
   1 234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 22nd, 2026 05:50 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios