More Black family tree
Feb. 13th, 2006 08:41 amArticle here at the Leaky.
Quick throughts before going off to work:
(1) Sirius' parents really were cousins, albeit second cousins? Cool. Toujours Pur is still canon-compatible a little bit longer. :)
(2) If Charlus and Dorea really were James' parents, then (*counts on fingers*) if I'm reading this correctly, that would make James and Sirius first cousins once removed, Harry and Sirius second cousins?
Quick throughts before going off to work:
(1) Sirius' parents really were cousins, albeit second cousins? Cool. Toujours Pur is still canon-compatible a little bit longer. :)
(2) If Charlus and Dorea really were James' parents, then (*counts on fingers*) if I'm reading this correctly, that would make James and Sirius first cousins once removed, Harry and Sirius second cousins?
no subject
Date: 2006-02-13 02:43 pm (UTC)If Charlus and Dorea were James's parents, which I'm not QUITE willing to accept, but maybe, since JKR did specify that it was a son, and there aren't any other living relatives for Harry, would James be a scorch mark? I assume that Mrs. Black was still alive in 1979 or whenever it was that James married Lily, and by all rights, if Andromeda is a scorchmark for marrying Ted, James should be one as well.
Would this also make Ron and Harry related, albeit distantly? My knowledge of geneology is pretty bad.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-13 03:13 pm (UTC)Maybe. Sirius says that Arthur is his second cousin once removed, meaning the great-grandparent of one is the great-great-grandparent of the other, but we don't know who this person is, so we can't tell if Dorea is also descended from this common ancestor or not.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-13 06:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-13 05:58 pm (UTC)If all the pure-bloods are related I suppose Ron and Harry pretty much have to be distantly related, probably third or fourth cousins, like anybody keeps track. (Even Sirius wasn't entirely sure exactly what relation he was to Arthur and Molly.)
no subject
Date: 2006-02-14 07:05 pm (UTC)I wondered about the molecular orbital theory of expressing kids as well. What I really wondered is was that how it appears on the actual tree in canon? Or is that JKR saying "hmmm. These people are not remotely important, I won't bother to make up names for them." Hard to say, really. If you're going to bother with a fancy tapestry, you'd probably bother with the names. Interesting, regardless. And I'll probably still ignore it for purposes of fics anyway. Heh.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-15 12:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-02-13 06:31 pm (UTC)And the three brothers Black still works too. Phew. As does Sirius' parents being cousins. ::snerk::
I'm still a bit leery of the Potter connection. Surely *someone* would have mentioned it by now if James (and by extension Harry) was that closely related to Sirius?
no subject
Date: 2006-02-13 08:43 pm (UTC)That gives me pause too -- but Harry's been left ignorant of a whole lot of things for plot reasons, including virtually everything about James and Lily, let alone his grandparents, so it's possible. I suppose the argument could be that Sirius would be related to Harry in about the same way as he was related to Arthur, and he was rather vague about that, maybe he was the sort of person who either just didn't keep track and/or assumed that most of the people he knew would be interrelated in some way because of the nature of the wizarding world?
no subject
Date: 2006-02-14 04:46 am (UTC)If Harry's grandparents were on the family tree, when he and Sirius discussed it, I'm certain it would have come up. I mean he was righ there with Harry, wouldn't he have pointed it out? Isn't it surprising enough that Harry noticed the Malfoy's on the tree, but not his own family name?
no subject
Date: 2006-02-14 07:27 am (UTC)Come on Jo, tell us these things, dammit. :)
no subject
Date: 2006-02-14 08:18 pm (UTC)James's parents were elderly, were getting on a little when he was born, which explains the only child, very pampered, had-him-late-in-life-so-he's-an-extra-treasure, as often happens, I think. They were old in wizarding terms, and they died. They succumbed to a wizarding illness.
If the Dorea and Charlus in the drawing are Harry's grandparents, Dorea would have given birth to James when she was 40 or thereabouts (according to Lexicon timelines, giving James a bd around 1959/60). For a non-magical woman that would mean "getting on" if we are talking in terms of fertility, for magical women... I don't know. Doesn't seem to correspond with the portrayal of someone like Minerva McGonnagal who is "old" in non-magical terms but still in the midst of her life in the magical world.
Also, Dorea died when she was 57, which does not exactly correspond to JKR's comment of the Potter grandparents being "old in wizarding terms". The "wizarding illness" might make sense but dying of old age doesn't...
no subject
Date: 2006-02-14 11:54 pm (UTC)The trouble is, if their son isn't James, then we have another Potter of about his age or a bit older that we've never previously heard of -- and Harry is supposed to be 'the last of the Potters'. Of course this other Potter could be dead (maybe killed in the war) but we would expect to have heard of him. Either way, in fact, there's something we (and Harry) should have been told about!
On reflection, I'd rate it about 6-4 on that the "1s" is James. :)
no subject
Date: 2006-02-15 03:24 am (UTC)I haven't a clue whether he's James. I'm going to wait until JKR tells us.
no subject
Date: 2006-02-15 04:30 pm (UTC)